<?xml version="1.0"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xml:lang="ru">
	<id>https://unilogia.su/index.php?action=history&amp;feed=atom&amp;title=Transmission_disequilibrium_test</id>
	<title>Transmission disequilibrium test - История изменений</title>
	<link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="https://unilogia.su/index.php?action=history&amp;feed=atom&amp;title=Transmission_disequilibrium_test"/>
	<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://unilogia.su/index.php?title=Transmission_disequilibrium_test&amp;action=history"/>
	<updated>2026-04-09T00:26:08Z</updated>
	<subtitle>История изменений этой страницы в вики</subtitle>
	<generator>MediaWiki 1.44.2</generator>
	<entry>
		<id>https://unilogia.su/index.php?title=Transmission_disequilibrium_test&amp;diff=780&amp;oldid=prev</id>
		<title>Admin: 1 версия импортирована</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://unilogia.su/index.php?title=Transmission_disequilibrium_test&amp;diff=780&amp;oldid=prev"/>
		<updated>2025-11-13T17:59:32Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;1 версия импортирована&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;table style=&quot;background-color: #fff; color: #202122;&quot; data-mw=&quot;interface&quot;&gt;
				&lt;col class=&quot;diff-marker&quot; /&gt;
				&lt;col class=&quot;diff-content&quot; /&gt;
				&lt;col class=&quot;diff-marker&quot; /&gt;
				&lt;col class=&quot;diff-content&quot; /&gt;
				&lt;tr class=&quot;diff-title&quot; lang=&quot;ru&quot;&gt;
				&lt;td colspan=&quot;2&quot; style=&quot;background-color: #fff; color: #202122; text-align: center;&quot;&gt;← Предыдущая версия&lt;/td&gt;
				&lt;td colspan=&quot;2&quot; style=&quot;background-color: #fff; color: #202122; text-align: center;&quot;&gt;Версия от 17:59, 13 ноября 2025&lt;/td&gt;
				&lt;/tr&gt;&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td colspan=&quot;4&quot; class=&quot;diff-notice&quot; lang=&quot;ru&quot;&gt;&lt;div class=&quot;mw-diff-empty&quot;&gt;(нет различий)&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;
&lt;!-- diff cache key mediawiki:diff:1.41:old-779:rev-780 --&gt;
&lt;/table&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Admin</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://unilogia.su/index.php?title=Transmission_disequilibrium_test&amp;diff=779&amp;oldid=prev</id>
		<title>ru&gt;Goldenspouse: /* growthexperiments-addlink-summary-summary:3|0|0 */</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://unilogia.su/index.php?title=Transmission_disequilibrium_test&amp;diff=779&amp;oldid=prev"/>
		<updated>2025-10-19T19:10:52Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;&lt;span class=&quot;autocomment&quot;&gt;growthexperiments-addlink-summary-summary:3|0|0&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;b&gt;Новая страница&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div&gt;{{short description|Test for genetic linkage between a marker and trait}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In [[genetics]], the &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;transmission disequilibrium test&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039; (&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;TDT&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;) was proposed by Spielman, McGinnis and [[Warren Ewens|Ewens]] (1993)&amp;lt;ref name=Spelman93&amp;gt;{{cite journal |vauthors=Spielman RS, McGinnis RE, Ewens WJ |title=Transmission test for linkage disequilibrium: the insulin gene region and insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus (IDDM) |journal=Am J Hum Genet |volume=52 |issue=3 |pages=506–16 |date=Mar 1993 |pmid=8447318 |pmc=1682161 }}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; as a family-based association test for the presence of [[genetic linkage]] between a [[genetic marker]] and a trait. It is an application of [[McNemar&amp;#039;s test]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A specificity of the TDT is that it will detect genetic linkage only in the presence of [[genetic association]].&lt;br /&gt;
While genetic association can be caused by population structure, genetic linkage will not be affected, which makes the TDT robust to the presence of [[Population structure (genetics)|population structure]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== The case of trios: one affected child per family ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Description of the test ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
We first describe the TDT in the case where families consist of trios (two parents and one affected child). Our description follows the notations used in Spielman, McGinnis &amp;amp; Ewens (1993).&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;Spelman93&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The TDT measures the over-transmission of an allele from heterozygous parents to affected offsprings.&lt;br /&gt;
The {{mvar|n}} affected offsprings have {{math|2&amp;#039;&amp;#039;n&amp;#039;&amp;#039;}} parents. These can be represented by the transmitted and the non-transmitted alleles {{math|&amp;#039;&amp;#039;M&amp;#039;&amp;#039;{{sub|1}}}} and {{math|&amp;#039;&amp;#039;M&amp;#039;&amp;#039;{{sub|2}}}} at some genetic locus. Summarizing the data in a 2 by 2 table gives:&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable&amp;quot; style=&amp;quot;margin:auto; text-align:center;&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
! &lt;br /&gt;
! colspan=3 | Non-transmitted allele&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
! Transmitted allele&lt;br /&gt;
! {{math|&amp;#039;&amp;#039;M&amp;#039;&amp;#039;{{sub|1}}}}&lt;br /&gt;
! {{math|&amp;#039;&amp;#039;M&amp;#039;&amp;#039;{{sub|2}}}}&lt;br /&gt;
! Total&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
! {{math|&amp;#039;&amp;#039;M&amp;#039;&amp;#039;{{sub|1}}}}&lt;br /&gt;
| {{mvar|a}}&lt;br /&gt;
| {{mvar|b}}&lt;br /&gt;
| {{math|&amp;#039;&amp;#039;a&amp;#039;&amp;#039; + &amp;#039;&amp;#039;b&amp;#039;&amp;#039;}}&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
! {{math|&amp;#039;&amp;#039;M&amp;#039;&amp;#039;{{sub|2}}}}&lt;br /&gt;
| {{mvar|c}}&lt;br /&gt;
| {{mvar|d}}&lt;br /&gt;
| {{math|&amp;#039;&amp;#039;c&amp;#039;&amp;#039; + &amp;#039;&amp;#039;d&amp;#039;&amp;#039;}}&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
! Total&lt;br /&gt;
| {{math|&amp;#039;&amp;#039;a&amp;#039;&amp;#039; + &amp;#039;&amp;#039;c&amp;#039;&amp;#039;}}&lt;br /&gt;
| {{math|&amp;#039;&amp;#039;b&amp;#039;&amp;#039; + &amp;#039;&amp;#039;d&amp;#039;&amp;#039;}}&lt;br /&gt;
| {{math|2&amp;#039;&amp;#039;n&amp;#039;&amp;#039;}}&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The derivation of the TDT shows that one should only use the heterozygous parents (total number {{math|&amp;#039;&amp;#039;b&amp;#039;&amp;#039; + &amp;#039;&amp;#039;c&amp;#039;&amp;#039;}}).&lt;br /&gt;
The TDT tests whether the proportions {{math|{{sfrac|&amp;#039;&amp;#039;b&amp;#039;&amp;#039;|&amp;#039;&amp;#039;b&amp;#039;&amp;#039; + &amp;#039;&amp;#039;c&amp;#039;&amp;#039;}}}} and {{math|{{sfrac|&amp;#039;&amp;#039;c&amp;#039;&amp;#039;|&amp;#039;&amp;#039;b&amp;#039;&amp;#039; + &amp;#039;&amp;#039;c&amp;#039;&amp;#039;}}}} are compatible with probabilities {{math|(0.5, 0.5)}}.&lt;br /&gt;
This hypothesis can be tested using a [[Binomial test|binomial]] (asymptotically chi-square) test with one degree of freedom:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math display=block&amp;gt; \chi^2 = \frac{ [b - (b+c)/2]^2}{(b+c)/2} + \frac{ [c - (b+c)/2]^2}{(b+c)/2} = \frac{(b-c)^2}{b+c} &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Outline of the test derivation ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A derivation of the test consists of using a population genetics model to obtain the expected proportions for the quantities {{math|&amp;#039;&amp;#039;a&amp;#039;&amp;#039;, &amp;#039;&amp;#039;b&amp;#039;&amp;#039;, &amp;#039;&amp;#039;c&amp;#039;&amp;#039;, &amp;#039;&amp;#039;d&amp;#039;&amp;#039;}} in the table above. In particular, one can show that under nearly all disease models the expected proportion of {{mvar|b}} and {{mvar|c}} are identical. This result motivates the use of a binomial (asymptotically {{math|&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;amp;chi;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;{{sup|2}}}}) test to test whether these proportions are equal.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
On the other hand, one can also show that under such models the proportions {{math|&amp;#039;&amp;#039;a&amp;#039;&amp;#039;, &amp;#039;&amp;#039;b&amp;#039;&amp;#039;, &amp;#039;&amp;#039;c&amp;#039;&amp;#039;, &amp;#039;&amp;#039;d&amp;#039;&amp;#039;}} are not equal to the product of the marginals probabilities &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\tfrac{a+b}{2n}, \tfrac{c+d}{2n}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; and &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\tfrac{a+c}{2n}, \tfrac{b+d}{2n}.&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; A rewording of this statement would be that the type of the transmitted allele is not, in general, independent of the type of the non-transmitted allele. A consequence is that a {{math|&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;amp;chi;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;{{sup|2}}}} test for homogeneity/independence does not test the appropriate hypothesis, and thus, only heterozygous parents are included.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Extension to two affected child per family ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Extension of the test ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The TDT can be readily extended beyond the case of trios. We keep following the notations of Spielman, McGinnis &amp;amp; Ewens (1993).&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;Spelman93&amp;quot; /&amp;gt; Consider a total of {{mvar|h}} heterozygous parents. We use the fact that the transmission to different children are independent. The information can be then summarized in three categories:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*{{mvar|i}} = number of parents who transmit {{math|&amp;#039;&amp;#039;M&amp;#039;&amp;#039;{{sub|1}}}} to both children.&lt;br /&gt;
*{{math|&amp;#039;&amp;#039;h&amp;#039;&amp;#039; &amp;amp;minus; &amp;#039;&amp;#039;i&amp;#039;&amp;#039; &amp;amp;minus; &amp;#039;&amp;#039;j&amp;#039;&amp;#039;}} = number of parents who transmit {{math|&amp;#039;&amp;#039;M&amp;#039;&amp;#039;{{sub|1}}}} to one child and {{math|&amp;#039;&amp;#039;M&amp;#039;&amp;#039;{{sub|2}}}} to another. &lt;br /&gt;
*{{mvar|j}} = number of parents who transmit {{math|&amp;#039;&amp;#039;M&amp;#039;&amp;#039;{{sub|2}}}} to both children.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Using the notations of the previous paragraph we have:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math display=block&amp;gt;\begin{align}&lt;br /&gt;
  b &amp;amp;= 2i + (h-i-j) = h + i - j \\ &lt;br /&gt;
  c &amp;amp;= 2j + (h-i-j) = h - i + j&lt;br /&gt;
\end{align}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
leading to the [[chi-squared test]] statistic:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math display=block&amp;gt; \chi_{tdt}^2 = \frac{4(i-j)^2}{h}. &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Relation with another linkage statistic ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The comparison with the more traditional (at least at the time when the TDT was proposed) linkage test proposed by Blackwelder and Elston 1985&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{cite journal |vauthors=Blackwelder WC, Elston RC |title=A comparison of sib-pair linkage tests for disease susceptibility loci |journal=Genetic Epidemiology |volume=2 |issue=1 |pages=85–97 |year=1985 |pmid=3863778 |doi=10.1002/gepi.1370020109 }}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; is informative.&lt;br /&gt;
The Blackwelder and Elston approach uses the total number of haplotypes identical by descent (mean [[haplotype]] sharing). This measure ignores the allelic state of a marker and simply compares the number of times a parent transmits the same allele to both affected children with the number of times a different allele is transmitted.&lt;br /&gt;
The [[test statistic]] is:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math display=block&amp;gt; \chi^2_{hs} = \frac{(2i+2j-h)^2}{h}. &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Under the [[null hypothesis]] of no linkage the expected proportions of {{math|(&amp;#039;&amp;#039;i&amp;#039;&amp;#039;, &amp;#039;&amp;#039;h&amp;#039;&amp;#039; &amp;amp;minus; &amp;#039;&amp;#039;i&amp;#039;&amp;#039; &amp;amp;minus; &amp;#039;&amp;#039;j&amp;#039;&amp;#039;, &amp;#039;&amp;#039;j&amp;#039;&amp;#039;)}} are {{math|(0.25, 0.5, 0.25)}}.  One can derive a simple chi-square statistic with 2 degrees of freedom:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math display=block&amp;gt; \chi^2_{total} = \frac{(i - h/4)^2}{h/4} + \frac{(h-i-j-h/2)^2}{h/2} + \frac{(j-h/4)^2}{h/4} = \chi^2_{tdt} + \chi^2_{hs}.&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It clearly appears that the total statistic (with two degree of freedom) is the sum of two independent components: one is the traditional linkage measure and the other is the TDT statistic.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Modified version ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
More recently, Wittkowski KM, Liu X. (2002/2004)&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{cite journal |vauthors=Wittkowski KM, Liu X |title=A statistically valid alternative to the TDT |journal=Hum. Hered. |volume=54 |issue=3 |pages=157–64 |year=2002 |pmid=12626848 |doi=10.1159/000068840 }}&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite journal |vauthors=Ewens WJ, Spielman RS |title=The TDT is a statistically valid test: comments on Wittkowski and Liu |journal=Hum. Hered. |volume=58 |issue=1 |pages=59–60; author reply 60–1; discussion 61–2 |year=2004 |pmid=15604566 |doi=10.1159/000081458 }}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; proposed a modification to the TDT that can be more powerful under some alternatives, although the asymptotic properties under the null hypothesis are equivalent.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The motivating idea for this modification is the fact that, while the transmissions of both allele from parents to a child are independent, the effects of other filial genetic or environmental covariates on [[penetrance]] are the same for both alleles transmitted to the same child. This situation can be important if, for example, the genetic marker is linked to a disease locus with a strong selection against heterozygous individuals. This observation suggests to shift the [[statistical model]] from a set of independent transmissions to a set of independent children (see Sasieni (1997)&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{cite journal |doi=10.2307/2533494 |author=Sasieni PD |title=From genotypes to genes: doubling the sample size |journal=Biometrics |volume=53 |issue=4 |pages=1253–61 |date=Dec 1997 |pmid=9423247 |jstor=2533494 }}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; for the corresponding problem in case-control association tests). While this observation does not affect the distribution under the null hypothesis of no linkage, it allows, for some disease models, to design a more powerful test.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In this modified TDT test the children are stratified by parental type and the modified test statistic becomes:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math display=block&amp;gt; \chi^2 = \frac{ \bigl( [n_{\rm PQ} - n_{\rm QQ}]_{\rm PQ \sim QQ} + 2\times[n_{\rm PP} - n_{\rm QQ}]_{\rm PQ \sim PQ} + [n_{\rm PP} - n_{\rm PQ}]_{\rm PP \sim PQ} \bigr)^2}{[n_{\rm PQ} + n_{\rm QQ}]_{\rm PQ \sim QQ} + 4\times[n_{\rm PP} + n_{\rm QQ}]_{\rm PQ \sim PQ} + [n_{\rm PQ} + n_{\rm PP}]_{\rm PP \sim PQ}}&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
where &amp;lt;math&amp;gt; [n_{\rm PQ}]_{\rm PQ \sim QQ} &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is the number of PQ children from parents with the PQ and QQ types.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
{{reflist}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*{{cite journal |vauthors=Ewens WJ, Spielman RS |title=What is the significance of a significant TDT? |journal=Hum. Hered. |volume=60 |issue=4 |pages=206–10 |year=2005 |pmid=16391488 |doi=10.1159/000090544 }}&lt;br /&gt;
*{{cite journal |vauthors=Spielman RS, Ewens WJ |title=A sibship test for linkage in the presence of association: the sib transmission/disequilibrium test |journal=Am J Hum Genet |volume=62 |issue=2 |pages=450–8 |date=Feb 1998 |pmid=9463321 |pmc=1376890 |doi=10.1086/301714 }}&lt;br /&gt;
*{{cite journal |vauthors=Spielman RS, Ewens WJ |title=The TDT and other family-based tests for linkage disequilibrium and association |journal=Am J Hum Genet |volume=59 |issue=5 |pages=983–9 |date=Nov 1996 |pmid=8900224 |pmc=1914831 }}&lt;br /&gt;
*{{cite journal |vauthors=Ewens WJ, Spielman RS |title=The transmission/disequilibrium test: history, subdivision, and admixture |journal=Am J Hum Genet |volume=57 |issue=2 |pages=455–64 |date=Aug 1995 |pmid=7668272 |pmc=1801556 }}&lt;br /&gt;
*{{cite journal |vauthors=McGinnis RE, Ewens WJ, Spielman RS |title=The TDT reveals linkage and linkage disequilibrium in a rare disease |journal=Genet Epidemiol |volume=12 |issue=6 |pages=637–40 |year=1995 |pmid=8787986 |doi=10.1002/gepi.1370120619 }}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Genetics]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>ru&gt;Goldenspouse</name></author>
	</entry>
</feed>